Basic program for a global reorganization (5 ideas for a possible alternative).

1 – EDUCATION: mandatory inclusion of the subject “Development of memory and speed reading” as early as the sixth year of the education system. This study, now marketed under the name “Eureka Method” costing more than a thousand euros per person, promises to increase the potential of the brain by over 80%. Shouldn’t this be a world heritage?

2 – POLICY: Change model; move from ineffective “democracy”, which also means a communist motto,” to a decisive “isocracy” which, from the Greek, means “equal powers.” In practice we have five equal powers: legislative, implementation, evaluation, prognostic and representative; each power have a coordinator. From among the proposed people selected, would be deployment of the five best “specialists” (of course individuals). The group will divide evenly the elected roles, powers and responsibilities. No parties, instead we will simply have “pentacoalizations”.

3 – CINEMA: transforming films so that it is no longer a projection, but a reflection, as in a mirror. From these words, it portrays diversity: thinking it shows more intensely the emotions to the audience, giving the audience the ability to concentrate rather than disperse. We live the movie in first person, by stimulating the hemisphere of the brain used less and learn more.

 4 – ECONOMY: Modernising the absurd division of economic sectors on which today’s economy is based. How can you be so limited as to believe that everything is divided between agriculture, industry, services, and an elusive and mysterious advantage service (which everyone says is his, but basically no one understands anything). All in all, however, the solution is simple:
First: economic assets.
Second: other assets.
Third: financial services.
Fourth: other services.
Fifth: National Bank
It is enough! No occult or hidden sector workers. Then, on this basis, hopefully renewal of the entire system will start.

5 – PHILOSOPHY: I oppose the Hegelian theory, which includes a thesis, antithesis and synthesis. In my personal theory, it should end with a “pro-thesis” the waste including the “synthesis” itself, reprocessed and recycled. All I would call “philosophical analysis”.

 
Simone Coen Balduzzi – for comments and questions: ridiesorridi@gmail.com